This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Gornick, J. C. Articles by Ross, K. E. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Supporting the Employment of Mothers: Policy Variation Across Fourteen Welfare States

University of New York, USA

Marcia K. Meyers

Columbia University, USA

Katherin E. Ross

Syracuse University, USA

This article compares 14 OECD countries, as of the middle-to-late 1980s, with respect to their provision of policies that support moth ers' employment: parental leave, child care, and the scheduling of public education. Newly gathered data on 18 policy indicators are pre sented. The indicators are then standardized, weighted, and summed into indices. By differ entiating policies that affect maternal employ ment from family policies more generally, these indices reveal dramatic cross-national differences in policy provisions.

The empirical results reveal loose clusters of countries that correspond only partially to prevailing welfare-state typologies. For mothers with preschool-aged children, only five of the 14 countries provided reasonably complete and continuous benefits that sup ported their options for combining paid work with family responsibilities. The pattern of cross-national policy variation changed no tably when policies affecting mothers with older children were examined.

The indices provide an improved measure of public support for maternal employment. They are also useful for contrasting family benefits that are provided through direct cash transfers with those that take the form of sup port for mothers' employment. Finally, these policy findings contribute to the body of schol arship that seeks to integrate gender issues more explicitly into research on welfare-state regimes.

Journal of European Social Policy, Vol. 7, No. 1, 45-70 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/095892879700700103


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. Ruppanner Conflict and Housework: Does Country Context Matter? Eur. Sociol. Rev., July 29, 2009; (2009) jcp038v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. E. Vos Falling fertility rates: new challenges to the European welfare state Socioecon. Rev., July 1, 2009; 7(3): 485 - 503. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Mandel and M. Shalev Gender, Class, and Varieties of Capitalism Soc. Pol., June 1, 2009; 16(2): 161 - 181. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Estevez-Abe Gender, Inequality, and Capitalism: The "Varieties of Capitalism" and Women Soc. Pol., June 1, 2009; 16(2): 182 - 191. [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Huber, J. D. Stephens, D. Bradley, S. Moller, and F. Nielsen The Politics of Women's Economic Independence Soc. Pol., March 1, 2009; 16(1): 1 - 39. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Bolzendahl Making the Implicit Explicit: Gender Influences on Social Spending in Twelve Industrialized Democracies, 1980-99 Soc. Pol., March 1, 2009; 16(1): 40 - 81. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Gash Preference or constraint? Part-time workers' transitions in Denmark, France and the United Kingdom Work Employment Society, December 1, 2008; 22(4): 655 - 674. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. A. Lambert The Comparative Political Economy of Parental Leave and Child Care: Evidence from Twenty OECD Countries Soc. Pol., September 1, 2008; 15(3): 315 - 344. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Hult and J. Edlund Age and labour market commitment in Germany, Denmark, Norway and Sweden Work Employment Society, March 1, 2008; 22(1): 109 - 128. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Motiejunaite and Z. Kravchenko Family policy, employment and gender-role attitudes: a comparative analysis of Russia and Sweden Journal of European Social Policy, February 1, 2008; 18(1): 38 - 49. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Savolainen, M. Lehti, and J. Kivivuori Historical Origins of a Cross-National Puzzle: Homicide in Finland, 1750 to 2000 Homicide Studies, February 1, 2008; 12(1): 67 - 89. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. S. Okun, A. L. Oliver, and O. Khait-Marelly The Public Sector, Family Structure, and Labor Market Behavior: Jewish Mothers in Israel Work and Occupations, May 1, 2007; 34(2): 174 - 204. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. O'Reilly Framing comparisons: gendering perspectives on cross-national comparative research on work and welfare Work Employment Society, December 1, 2006; 20(4): 731 - 750. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. Esping-Andersen and S. Sarasa The generational conflict reconsidered Journal of European Social Policy, February 1, 2002; 12(1): 5 - 21. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. S. Orloff Explaining US welfare reform: power, gender, race and the US policy legacy Critical Social Policy, February 1, 2002; 22(1): 96 - 118. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. Russell and P. J. O'Connell Getting a Job in Europe: The Transition from Unemployment to Work among Young People in Nine European Countries Work Employment Society, March 1, 2001; 15(1): 1 - 24. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. D. Stephens Legitimacy and work incentives in Nordic welfare states Acta Sociologica, January 1, 1998; 41(4): 382 - 384. [PDF]