This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by de Beer, P. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Why work is not a panacea: a decomposition analysis of EU-15 countries

University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands, p.t.debeer{at}uva.nl

Increasing the level of labour participation is one of the key objectives of the European Employment Strategy and the Lisbon agenda. Increasing the employment rate is generally considered crucially important to safeguarding the sustainability of the welfare state and achieving a number of other socio-economic objectives. This article examines the extent to which higher employment does result in lower unemployment, lower poverty rates, decreased dependence on social security and reductions in public expenditures on social protection. To this end, a decomposition analysis is performed concerning the evolution of the unemployment rate, poverty rate, benefit recipiency rate and social expenditure rate in the 15 original EU member states and the United States since the 1980s. Results of this analysis show that, in many cases, the favourable effects of increases in employment are partially (and sometimes even fully) offset by simultaneous changes in other variables, including labour supply, eligibility criteria, benefit generosity and the concentration of non-working people in work-poor households. The article concludes that increasing the employment rate is not a panacea for all socio-economic ills. European social policy should therefore focus less one-sidedly on employment and should address additional objectives, including benefit generosity and poverty. In addition, the process of benchmarking in the EU should be transformed from its current top-down character to one which proceeds from the bottom up.

Key Words: employment • European Employment Strategy • European social security • labour participation • poverty

References

• Adema, W. and Ladaique, M. (2005) Net Social Expenditure, 2005 Edition — More Comprehensive Measures of Social Support, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Paper No. 29. Paris: OECD.
• Arents, M., Cluitmans, M.M. and van der Ende, M.A. (1999) Benefit Dependency Ratios — an Analysis of Nine European Countries, Japan and the US Rotterdam: Nederlands Economisch Instituut.
• Atkinson, A.B. (1999) The Economic Consequences of Rolling Back the Welfare State. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
• Atkinson, A.B. and Brandolini, A. (2001) `Promise and Pitfalls in the Use of "Secondary" Data-sets: Income Inequality in OECD Countries as a Case Study', Journal of Economic Literature 39: 771—99.[Web of Science]
• Atkinson, A.B., Marlier, E. and Nolan, B. (2004) `Indicators and Targets for Social Inclusion in the European Union', Journal of Common Market Studies 42 (1): 47—75.
• Barr, N. (1992) `Economic Theory and the Welfare State: a Survey and Interpretation', Journal of Economic Literature 30: 741—803.[Web of Science]
• Beveridge, W.H. (1942) Social Insurance and Allied Services. London: His Majesty's Stationery Office.
• Beveridge, W.H. (1944) Full Employment in a Free Society: A Report. London: Allen & Unwin.
• Clark, A.E. and Oswald, A.J. (1994) `Unhappiness and Unemployment', The Economic Journal 104: 648—59.[CrossRef]
• Danziger, S., Haveman, R. and Plotnick, R. (1981) `How Income Transfer Programs Affect Work, Savings, and the Income Distribution: a Critical Review', Journal of Economic Literature 19: 975—1028.[Web of Science]
• De la Porte, C. and Pochet, P. (2004) `The European Employment Strategy: Existing Research and Remaining Questions', Journal of European Social Policy 14 (1): 71—8.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• De la Porte, C., Pochet, P. and Room, G. (2001) `Social Benchmarking, Policy Making and New Governance in the EU', Journal of Europan Social Policy 11 (4): 291—307.
• Esping-Andersen, G. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
• Esping-Andersen, G. (1996a) `After the golden age? Welfare state dilemmas in a global economy', in: Esping-Andersen, G. (ed.) Welfare States in Transition. National Adaptations in Global Economies, pp. 1—31. London/ Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: Sage Publications.
• Esping-Andersen, G. (1996b) `Welfare states without work: the impasse of labour shedding and familialism in continental European social policy', in: Esping-Andersen. G. (ed.) Welfare States in Transition. National Adaptations in Global Economics, pp. 66—87. London/ Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: Sage Publications.
• European Commission (EC) (2002) Taking Stock of Five Years of the European Employment Strategy, COM (2002) 416. Brussels: European Commission.
• European Commission (EC) (2005) Common Actions for Growth and Employment: the Community Lisbon Programme, COM (2005) 330. Brussels: European Commission.
• Förster, M. (2000) Trends and Driving Factors in Income Distribution and Poverty in the OECD Area, Labour Market and Social Policy Occasional Papers No. 42, Directorate for Education, Employment, Labour and Social Affairs. Paris: OECD.
• Förster, M. and D'Ercole, M.M. (2005) Income Distribution and Poverty in OECD Countries in the Second Half of the 1990s, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers No. 22. Paris: OECD.
• Jahoda, M., Lazarsfeld, P. and Zeisl, H. (1933) Die Arbeitslosen von Marienthal: Ein soziographischer Versuch über die Wirkungen langdauernder Arbeitslosigkeit. Leipzig: S. Hirzel.
• Korpi, T. (1997) `Is Utility Related to Employment Status? Employment, Unemployment, Labor Market Policies and Subjective Well-being among Swedish Youth', Labour Economics 4: 125—47.[CrossRef]
• Lindbeck, A. (1994) `The Welfare State and the Employment Problem', American Economic Review (Papers and Proceedings) 84 (2): 71—5.[Web of Science]
• Lindbeck, A. (1997) `The Swedish Experiment', Journal of Economic Literature 35: 1273—319.[Web of Science]
• LIS (Luxembourg Income Study) (various years) Key figures. Accessed at: [http://www.lisproject.org/keyfigures.htm].
• Moor, I., Vossen, I. and Arents, M. (2002) Benefit Dependency Ratios by Gender. An International Comparison. Final report. The Hague: Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment/Elsevier bedrijfsinformatie.
• Mosher, J.S. and Trubek, D.M. (2003) `Alternative Approaches to Governance in the EU: EU Social Policy and the European Employment Strategy', Journal of Common Market Studies 41 (1): 63—88.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Myles, J. (1996) `When Markets Fail: Social Welfare in Canada and the United States', in G. Esping-Andersen (ed.) Welfare States in Transition National Adaptations in Global Economies, pp. 116—40. London /Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: Sage Publications.
• O'Connor, J.S. (2006) `Policy Coordination, Social Indicators and the Social-policy Agenda in the European Union', Journal of European Social Policy 15 (4): 345—61.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
• Oecd (2003) `Benefits and Employment, Friend or Foe? Interactions Between Passive and Active Social Programmes', OECD Employment Outlook 2003: 171—235.
• Oecd (2006) OECD Statistics. Accessed at: [http://stats.oecd.org/wbos].
• Oecd (2007) Social Expenditure Database (SOCX 2007), 1980—2003. Paris: OECD. Accessed at: [http://www.oecd.org/document/9/0,2340,en_2649_34635_38141385_1_1_1_1,00.html].
• Scharpf, F.W. (1999) The Viability of Advanced Welfare States in the International Economy: Vulnerabilities and Options, MPIfG Working Paper 99/9 Cologne: Max Planck Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung.
• Social Protection Committee (SPC) (2002) Fight against Poverty and Social Exclusion: Common Objectives for the Second Round of National Action Plans, SOC 508 Brussels: Council of the European Union.
• Stephens, J.D. (1996) `The Scandinavian Welfare States: Achievement, Crisis, and Prospects', in G. Esping-Andersen (ed.) Welfare States in Transition. National Adaptations in Global Economies, pp. 32—65. London/ Thousand Oaks/New Delhi: Sage Publications.

Journal of European Social Policy, Vol. 17, No. 4, 375-388 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0958928707081073


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This Article Abstract Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by de Beer, P. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?